How Forge compares

Forge vs the alternatives for field inspection AI

Most computer-vision platforms are built for machine-learning teams shipping cloud APIs. Forge is built for inspection and QA teams shipping a model to their crews' phones. Here is an honest look at how it compares to the usual options.

  SkillsBase Forge Roboflow LandingLens Vertex AI / Azure Custom Vision In-house build
Built for Field inspection & QA teams ML engineers, edge devices Manufacturing ML teams ML / cloud engineers Your data scientists
Code required None SDK / code to deploy Cloud / API-first Yes Yes
Data to start (per fault) ~15 images Hundreds to thousands Hundreds Thousands Thousands
Inspector mobile app Branded iOS & Android, included No (targets edge devices) No No Build it yourself
Runs offline on-device Yes Depends on setup Cloud-first Cloud-first Depends
Time to first deployed model Days Weeks Weeks Weeks to months 3 to 6 months

Forge vs Roboflow

Roboflow is a capable, general-purpose computer-vision platform, but it is built for developers: you label and train in the tool, then write code against an SDK to deploy, typically to edge devices rather than to a crew's phone. Forge is end-to-end and no-code, and the inspector mobile app is part of the product, not something you build afterwards.

Best for inspection teams without engineers: Forge

Forge vs LandingLens

LandingLens is strong industrial visual AI, focused on the manufacturing line and cloud or API-first delivery. Forge covers field inspection more broadly, telecoms, utilities, construction, and the work that happens away from a fixed line, and ships a branded phone app that runs the model offline in tunnels, cabinets, and dead zones.

Best for field work off the production line: Forge

Forge vs Vertex AI / Azure Custom Vision

The hyperscaler platforms are powerful and flexible, and they assume an engineering team: you write code and you bring a lot of data, often thousands of images per class. Forge needs no code and starts from around 15 images per fault, because every model begins from a starting point already adapted to real field-inspection imagery.

Best for no-code, low-data starts: Forge

Forge vs an in-house build

Building it yourself, or hiring a consultancy, can work, but it usually means a 3 to 6 month project and a six-figure budget before the first model reaches the field, plus an app to build and maintain. With Forge, the people who already know your faults build and deploy the model themselves, in days, and retrain in one click as faults change.

Best for speed and cost: Forge

See it on your own faults.

Bring the defects your current tools keep missing, and we will show you what a model trained on your own data can catch, no data scientists, no consultants.

Book a demo